Vol. 76 (4) 2024

ARTICLES

Effect of Landscape Configuration on Bird Communities in Abandoned Agricultural Lands in Bulgaria

Sylvia Dyulgerova* & Valko Biserkov

More info

*Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2 Gagarin Street, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria; sylvia.dyulgerova@gmail.com

https://doi.org/10.71424/azb76.4.002651

PDF

Abstract
Changes of distribution and abundance of common birds associated with alterations in the composition and configuration of landscapes in Bulgaria are presented. They are measured by a set of metrics in a model area of abandoned agricultural lands in different stages of vegetation succession. Under such conditions, the edge effect proved to be а significant factor for the species composition. The established specific preferences of the farmland and forest specialists as well as the generalist species in four landscape classes (Open Landscapes, Shrubland, Open Forest and Forest) contribute to better understanding of the causes of changes in breeding population trends. These data allow predicting the impact on the habitat bird guilds when developing landscape management plans for protected areas or conservation measures for priority bird species. This approach can increase the effectiveness of the implementation of European agri-environmental measures.

Key words
landscape structure, ecotone effect, farmland birds, agricultural abandonment, specialists, generalists

How to Cite
Dyulgerova S. & Biserkov V. 2024. Effect of Landscape Configuration on Bird Communities in Abandoned Agricultural Lands in Bulgaria. Acta zoologica bulgarica 76 (4) 533-542.

References

  1. Annual Report of the Executive Forest Agency 2019. http://eea.government.bg/bg/soer/2019/forest/gorskite-resursi-i-tehniya-prinos-kam-globalnite-tsikli-na-vaglerod-1
  2. Barnagaud J. Y., Devictor V., Jiguet F. & Archaux F. 2011. When species become generalists: on‐going large‐scale changes in bird habitat specialization. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20(4): 630–640.
  3. Bonthoux S. & Balent G. 2012. Point count duration: five minutes are usually sufficient to model the distribution of bird species and to study the structure of communities for a French landscape. Journal of Ornithology 153(2): 491–504.
  4. Borges F., Glemnitz M., Schultz A. & Stachow U. 2017. Assessing the habitat suitability of agricultural landscapes for characteristic breeding bird guilds using landscape metrics. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 189(4): 1–21.
  5. Brlík V., Šilarová E., Škorpilová J., Alonso H., Anton M., Aunins A., Benkö Z., Biver G., Busch M., Chodkiewicz T. & Chylarecki P. 2021. Long-term and large-scale multispecies dataset tracking population changes of common European breeding birds. Scientific Data 8(1): 1–9.
  6. Caprio E., Ellena I. & Rolando A. 2009. Assessing habitat/landscape predictors of bird diversity in managed deciduous forests: a seasonal and guild-based approach. Biodiversity and Conservation 18(5): 1287–1303.
  7. Carrara E., Arroyo-Rodríguez V., Vega-Rivera J. H., Schondube J. E., de Freitas S. M. & Fahrig L. 2015. Impact of landscape composition and configuration on forest specialist and generalist bird species in the fragmented Lacandona rainforest, Mexico. Biological Conservation 184: 117–126.
  8. Clavero M. & Brotons L. 2010. Functional homogenization of bird communities along habitat gradients: accounting for niche multidimensionality. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19(5): 684–696.
  9. Concepción E. D., Aneva I., Jay M., Lukanov S., Marsden K., Moreno G., Oppermann R., Pardo A., Piskol S., Rolo V. & Schraml A. 2020. Optimizing biodiversity gain of European agriculture through regional targeting and adaptive management of conservation tools. Biological Conservation 241: 108384.
  10. Davidova S. 1994. Change in agricultural policies and restructuring of Bulgarian agriculture: an overview. In: Policy and Institutional Reform in Central European Agriculture, pp. 31–75.
  11. Donald P. F., Green R. E. & Heath M. F. 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268(1462): 25–29.
  12. Dyulgerova S., Gramatikov M., Pedashenko H., Vassilev K., Kati V. & Nikolov S. C. 2015. Farmland birds and agricultural land abandonment: evidences from Bulgaria. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 67(2): 223–234.
  13. Gibbons D. W. & Gregory R. D. 2006. Point counts or point transects. In: Ecological Census Techniques, pp. 324–332.
  14. Gregory R. D., Skorpilova J., Vorisek P. & Butler S. 2019. An analysis of trends, uncertainty and species selection shows contrasting trends of widespread forest and farmland birds in Europe. Ecological Indicators 103: 676–687.
  15. Häkkilä M., Abrego N., Ovaskainen O. & Mönkkönen M. 2018. Habitat quality is more important than matrix quality for bird communities in protected areas. Ecology and Evolution 8(8): 4019–4030.
  16. Heikkinen R. K., Luoto M., Virkkala R. & Rainio K. 2004. Effects of habitat cover, landscape structure and spatial variables on the abundance of birds in an agricultural–forest mosaic. Journal of Applied Ecology 41(5): 824–835.
  17. Iankov P. (Ed.) 2007. Atlas of breeding birds in Bulgaria. Sofia, Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds.
  18. Kamp J., Reinhard A., Frenzel M., Kämpfer S., Trappe J. & Hölzel N. 2018. Farmland bird responses to land abandonment in Western Siberia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 268: 61–69.
  19. Le Viol I., Jiguet F., Brotons L., Herrando S., Lindström Å., Pearce-Higgins J. W., Reif J., Van Turnhout C. & Devictor V. 2012. More and more generalists: two decades of changes in the European avifauna. Biology Letters 8(5): 780–782.
  20. Long J. A. 2019. JTOOLS: Analysis and presentation of social scientific data. R package version 2(1).
  21. Marja R., Uuemaa E., Mander Ü., Elts J. & Truu J. 2013. Landscape pattern and census area as determinants of the diversity of farmland avifauna in Estonia. Regional Environmental Change 13(5): 1013–1020.
  22. McGarigal K. & Marks B. J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
  23. McGarigal K. 2015. FRAGSTATS help. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
  24. Morelli F., Pruscini F., Santolini R., Perna P., Benedetti Y. & Sisti D. 2013. Landscape heterogeneity metrics as indicators of bird diversity: determining the optimal spatial scales in different landscapes. Ecological Indicators 34: 372–379.
  25. Morelli F., Benedetti Y. & Šímová P. 2018. Landscape metrics as indicators of avian diversity and community measures. Ecological Indicators (90): 132–141.
  26. PECBMS 2019. State of common European breeding birds 2018. CSO, Prague.
  27. Pe’er G., Finn J. A., Díaz M., Birkenstock M., Lakner S., Röder N., Kazakova Y., Šumrada T., Bezák P., Concepción E. D. & Dänhardt J. 2022. How can the European Common Agricultural Policy help halt biodiversity loss? Recommendations by over 300 experts. Conservation Letters 15(6): 12901.
  28. R Core Team 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org
  29. Ralph C. J., Droege S. & Sauer J. R. 1995. Managing and monitoring birds using point counts: standards and applications. In: Ralph C. J., Sauer J. R., Droege S. (Eds.): Monitoring bird populations by point counts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149. Albany, CA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: pp. 161–168.
  30. Reif J., Voříšek P., Šťastný K., Bejček V. & Petr J. 2008. Agricultural intensification and farmland birds: new insights from a central European country. Ibis 150(3): 596–605.
  31. Reif J. & Vermouzek Z. 2019. Collapse of farmland bird populations in an Eastern European country following its EU accession. Conservation Letters 12(1): e12585.
  32. Ripley B., Venables B., Bates D.M., Hornik K., Gebhardt A., Firth D. & Ripley M. B. 2013. Package “mass”. Cran R 538: 113–120.
  33. Rüdisser J., Walde J., Tasser E., Frühauf J., Teufelbauer N. & Tappeiner U. 2015. Biodiversity in cultural landscapes: influence of land use intensity on bird assemblages. Landscape Ecology 30(10): 1851–1863.
  34. Schindler S., von Wehrden H., Poirazidis K., Wrbka T. & Kati V. 2013. Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates. Ecological Indicators 31: 41–48.
  35. Sirami C., Brotons L., Burfield I., Fonderflick J. & Martin J. L. 2008. Is land abandonment having an impact on biodiversity? A meta-analytical approach to bird distribution changes in the north-western Mediterranean. Biological Conservation 141(2): 450–459.
  36. Spasov S., Hristov I., Eaton M. & Nikolov S. C. 2017. Population trends of common birds in Bulgaria: Is their status improving after the EU accession. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 69(1): 95–104.
  37. Terraube J., Archaux F., Deconchat M., Van Halder I., Jactel H. & Barbaro L. 2016. Forest edges have high conservation value for bird communities in mosaic landscapes. Ecology and Evolution 6(15): 5178–5189.
  38. Wretenberg J., Lindström Å., Svensson S., Thierfelder T. & Pärt T. 2006. Population trends of farmland birds in Sweden and England: similar trends but different patterns of agricultural intensification. Journal of Applied Ecology 43(6): 1110–1120.
  39. Zakkak S., Radovic A., Nikolov S. C., Shumka S., Kakalis L. & Kati V. 2015. Assessing the effect of agricultural land abandonment on bird communities in southern-eastern Europe. Journal of Environmental Management 164: 171–179.