Vol. 75 (3) 2023
ARTICLES
Sensory Basis of Food and Predator Detection in the Tadpoles of the Indian Skipper Frog Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis (Schneider, 1799) (Anura: Dicroglossidae): an Empirical Study
Santosh M. Mogali*, Bhagyashri A. Shanbhag & Srinivas K. Saidapur
More info
*Department of Zoology, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580 003, Karnataka State, India; E-mil: santoshmogali@rediffmail.com
Abstract
The majority of the amphibian larvae spend their early life stage in aquatic medium. In such system, they respond to a broad array of stimuli (tactile, chemical and visual cues) and exhibit suitable behavioural responses. The ability of detection of food and predator was studied in the tadpoles of the Indian skipper frog Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis in the laboratory setup by using a rectangular glass test tank with end compartments (stimulus zones) providing exclusively visual and and (or) chemical food (either boiled spinach or tadpoles of Duttaphrynus melanostictus) and predator (tadpoles of Hoplobatrachus tigerinus). A test tadpole E. cyanophlyctis was held at the centre of the test tank for 5 min (acclimation) to perceive visual and (or) chemical food or predator cues. Then it was released from the centre of the test tank and allowed to associate or stay away from the caged stimulus subjects (food or predator), which were placed at one end of the test tank either in a glass beaker (visual cues) or in a mesh cage wrapped with cheese cloth (chemical cues) for a period of 10 min. The test tadpoles failed to detect either food or predator through visual cues. They spent almost an equal amount of time in the zone housing food or predator in a glass beaker as compared to the opposite zone, which was kept empty. However, they detected both food and predator solely through chemical cues. In tests with chemical food cues (either boiled spinach or tadpoles of D. melanostictus), they spent the majority of their time (67.25 % of total time) near chemical food cues rather than empty or visual food cues. In contrast, in tests with chemical predator cues (tadpoles of H. tigerinus), they spent the majority of their time (68.89 % of total time) away from the chemical predator cues. Therefore, the findings show that E. cyanophlyctis tadpoles detect both food and predator through chemical sensory mechanism rather than visual ones.
Key words
Anurans, food and predator detection, tadpole, visual and chemical cues
How to Cite
Mogali S.M., Shanbhag B.A. & Saidapur S.K. 2023. Sensory Basis of Food and Predator Detection in the Tadpoles of the Indian Skipper Frog Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis (Schneider, 1799) (Anura: Dicroglossidae): an Empirical Study. Acta zoologica bulgarica 75 (3) 359-365.
References
- Benard M. F. 2004. Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in organisms with complex life cycles. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 651–673.
- Carlson B. E., Newman J. C., & Langkilde T. 2015. Food or fear: hunger modifies responses to injured conspecifics in tadpoles. Hydrobiologia 743: 299–308.
- Ferrari M. C. O., Wisenden B. D., & Chivers D. P. 2010. Chemical ecology of predator-prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 88: 698–724.
- Gazzola A., Guadin B., Balestrieri A., & Pellitteri-Rosa D. 2022. Multimodal cues do not improve predator recognition in green toad tadpoles. Animals 12: 2603.
- Hemnani M., Guimarães I. S. C., Kaefer I. L., & de Silva Pires T. H. 2022. Alarm reaction depends on multiple chemical cues in tadpoles of the cane toad (Rhinella marina). Ethology Ecology and Evolution 10.1080/03949370.2022.2082537.
- Hettyey A., Rölli F., Thurlimann N., Zurcher A. C., & Van Buskirk J. 2012. Visual cues contribute to predator detection in anuran larvae. Biological Journal of Linnean Society London 106: 820–827.
- Hickman C. R., Stone M. D., & Mathis A. 2004. Priority use of chemical over visual cues for detection of predators by graybelly salamanders, Eurycea multiplicata griseogaster. Herpetologica 60: 203–210.
- Hiragond N. C. & Saidapur S. K. 2001. Microhabitat choice of tadpoles of seven anuran species. Current Herpetology 20: 51–60.
- Hoff K. V., Blaustein A. R., McDiarmid R. W. & Altig R. 1999. Behaviour: interactions and their consequences. In Tadpoles: Biology of Anuran Larvae (eds McDiarmid, R. W. and Altig, R.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 215–239.
- Jowers M. J., Campbell-Palmer R., Walsh P. T. & Downie J. R. 2006. Intraspecific variation in the avoidance response of stream frog (Mannophryne trinitatis) tadpoles to fish and prawn predators. Herpetological Journal 16: 337–346.
- Kiesecker J. M., Chivers D. P. & Blaustein A. R. 1996. The use of chemical cues in predator recognition by western toad tadpoles. Animal Behaviour 52: 1237–1245.
- Lannoo M. J. 1999. Integration: nervous and sensory systems. In Tadpoles: Biology of Anuran Larvae (eds McDiarmid, R. W. and Altig, R.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 149–169.
- Laurila A. 2000. Behavioral responses to predator chemical cues and local variation in antipredator performance in Rana temporaria tadpoles. Oikos 88: 159–168.
- Mogali S. M. 2018. Predatory cues influence the behavioral responses and metamorphic traits of Polypedates maculatus (Anura: Rhacophoridae). Asian Herpetological Research 9: 188–194.
- Mogali S. M., Saidapur S. K. & Shanbhag B. A. 2012. Tadpoles of the bronze frog (Rana temporalis) assess predation risk before evoking antipredator defense behaviour. Journal of Ethology 30: 379–386.
- Mogali S. M., Saidapur S. K. & Shanbhag B. A. 2017. Influence of desiccation threat on the metamorphic traits of the Asian common toad, Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Anura). Acta Herpetologica 12: 175–180.
- Mogali S. M., Shanbhag B. A. & Saidapur S. K. 2022. Sensory basis of food detection in tadpoles of Polypedates maculatus (Anura: Rhacophoridae): an experimental approach. Phyllomedusa 21: 29–35.
- Saidapur S. K., Veeranagoudar D. K., Hiragond N. C. & Shanbhag B. A. 2009. Mechanism of predator-prey detection and behavioral responses in some anuran tadpoles. Chemoecology 19: 21–28.
- Stauffer H. & Semlitsch R. D. 1993. Effects of visual, chemical and tactile cues of fish on the behavioral responses of tadpoles. Animal Behavior 46: 355–364.
- Sugur H. S., Mulla G. S., Purohit I. R., Shanbhag B. A. & Saidapur S. K. 2008. Sensory basis of food perception in tadpoles of the frog, Sphaerotheca breviceps. Current Science 95: 1743–1746.
- Veeranagoudar D. K., Shanbhag B. A. & Saidapur S. K. 2004. Mechanism of food detection in the tadpoles of the bronze frog Rana temporalis. Acta Ethologica 7: 37–41.
- Wilbur H. M. 1980. Complex life cycles. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 67–93.


