Vol. 76 (4) 2024
ARTICLES
Antipredator Behavioural Responses of Tadpoles of the Indian Painted Frog Uperodon taprobanicus (Parker, 1934) (Microhylidae) to Kairomones from the Predatory Tadpoles of the Indian Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus tigerinus (Daudin, 1803) (Dicroglossidae)
Santosh M. Mogali*, Bhagyashri A. Shanbhag & Srinivas K. Saidapur
More info
*Department of Zoology, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580 003, Karnataka State, India; santoshmogali@rediffmail.com
Abstract
In aquatic systems, many prey animals, including anuran tadpoles, predominantly use chemical cues to assess predation threat. In such systems, an array of chemical cues (e.g., kairomones, alarm, dietary) affects the behavioural responses of the prey tadpoles. The study on the behavioural responses of tadpoles belongs to the family Microhylidae to predators are very less hence the outcome of this study will provide a novel information in the field of behavioural ecology of anuran tadpoles with reference to prey-predator interactions. The behavioural responses of tadpoles of Indian painted frog Uperodon taprobanicus (Microhylidae) to its naturally co-existing predatory tadpoles of the Indian bullfrog Hoplobatrachus tigerinus (Dicroglossidae) were studied in the laboratory. The predator’s kairomones (water conditioned by a starved predator) was used to simulate predation threat. The results of the experiment showed that U. taprobanicus tadpoles exhibited strong antipredator behavioural responses, i.e. drastically reduced swimming movements and overall time spent in swimming as well as had a higher burst speed in response to kairomones of predators. Thus, U. taprobanicus tadpoles consider H. tigerinus tadpoles as potential predators. This may be because of long ecological co-existence of U. taprobanicus tadpoles with sympatric carnivorous tadpoles, H. tigerinus may have led to the evolution of antipredator defence strategies in response to kairomones of these predators. In summary, tadpoles of U. taprobanicus perceive predation risk by detecting kairomones emanating from the predator H. tigerinus and showed appropriate antipredator behavioural responses.
Key words
Amphibians, burst speed, chemical cues, prey-predator interactions, stimulus solution, swimming activity
How to Cite
Mogali S.M., Shanbhag B.A. & Saidapur S.K. 2024. Antipredator Behavioural Responses of Tadpoles of the Indian Painted Frog Uperodon taprobanicus (Parker, 1934) (Microhylidae) to Kairomones from the Predatory Tadpoles of the Indian Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus tigerinus (Daudin, 1803)(Dicroglossidae). Acta zoologica bulgarica 76 (4) 513-516.
References
- Anderson R.B. & Lawler S. P. 2016. Behavioural changes in tadpoles after multigenerational exposure to an invasive intraguild predator. Behavioural Ecology 27: 1790–1796.
- Benard M. F. 2004. Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in organisms with complex life cycles. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 651–673.
- Berec M., Klapka V. & Zemek R. 2016. Effect of an alien turtle predator on movement activity of European brown frog tadpoles. Italian Journal of Zoology 83: 68–76.
- Chivers D. P. & Mirza R. S. 2001. Importance of predator diet cues in responses of larval wood frogs to fish and invertebrate predators. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: 45–51.
- Dayton, G. H., Saenz D., Baum K. A., Langerhans R. B. & DeWitt T. J. 2005. Body shape, burst speed and escape behaviour of larval anurans. Oikos 111: 582–591.
- Ferrari M. C. O., Wisenden B. D. & Chivers D. P. 2010. Chemical ecology of predator-prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 88: 698–724.
- Gosner K. L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183–190.
- Gyssels F. & Stoks R. 2006. Behavioural responses of fish kairomones and autotomy in a damselfly. Journal of Ethology 24: 79–83.
- Hazlett B. A. & Schoolmaster D. R. 1998. Responses of cambarid crayfish to predator odor. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24: 1757–1770.
- Hickman C. R., Stone M. D. & Mathis A. 2004. Priority use of chemical over visual cues for detection of predators by graybelly salamanders, Eurycea multiplicata griseogaster. Herpetologica 60: 203–210.
- Hossie T. J. & Murray D. L. 2010. You can’t run but you can hide: refuge use in frog tadpoles elicits density-dependent predation by dragonfly larvae. Oecologia 163: 395–404.
- Kats L. B. & Dill L. M. 1998. The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5: 361–394.
- Kiesecker J. M., Chivers D. P. & Blaustein A. R. 1996. The use of chemical cues in predator recognition by western toad tadpoles. Animal Behaviour 52: 1237–1245.
- Laurila A., Kujasalo J. & Ranta E. 1997. Different antipredator behaviour in two anuran tadpoles: effect of predator diet. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 40: 329–336.
- Lawler S. P. 1989. Behavioural responses to predators and predation risk in four species of larval anurans. Animal Behaviour 38: 1039–1047.
- Loman J. 1999. Early metamorphosis in common frog Rana temporaria tadpoles at risk of drying: an experimental demonstration. Amphibia-Reptilia 20: 421–430.
- Mathis A. 2003. Use of chemical cues in detection of conspecific predators and prey by newts, Notophthalmus viridescens. Chemoecology 13: 193–197.
- Mogali S. M., Saidapur S. K. & Shanbhag B. A. 2011. Levels of predation modulate antipredator defense behaviour and metamorphic traits in the toad Bufo melanostictus. Journal of Herpetology 45: 428–431.
- Mogali S. M., Saidapur S. K. & Shanbhag B. A. 2020. Behavioural responses of tadpoles of Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Anura: Bufonidae) to cues of starved and fed dragonfly larvae. Phyllomedusa 19: 93–98.
- Mogali S. M., Shanbhag B. A. & Saidapur S. K. 2022. Antipredator responses of tadpoles to kairomones from an omnivorous tadpole. Herpetological Review 53: 404–407.
- Mogali S. M., Shanbhag B. A. & Saidapur S. K. 2023. Behavioral responses of omnivorous Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis tadpoles to carnivorous Hoplobatrachus tigerinus tadpoles. Herpetological Review 54: 195–199.
- Newman R. A. 1992. Adaptive plasticity in amphibian metamorphosis. Bioscience 42: 671–678.
- Relyea R. A. 2007. Getting out alive: how predators affect the decision to metamorphose. Oecologia 152: 389–400.
- Saidapur S. K. 2001. Behavioral ecology of anuran tadpoles: the Indian scenario. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy B67: 311–322.
- Schmidt B. R. & Amezquita A. 2001. Predator-induced behavioural responses: tadpoles of the Neotropical frog Phyllomedusa tarsius do not respond to all predators. Herpetological Journal 11: 9–15.
- Schoeppner N. M. & Relyea R. A. 2005. Damage, digestion, and defence: the roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defences. Ecology Letters 8: 505–512.
- Schoeppner N. M. & Relyea R. A. 2009a. Interpreting the smells of predation: how alarm cues and kairomones induce different prey defences. Functional Ecology 23: 1114–1121.
- Schoeppner N. M. & Relyea R. A. 2009b. When should prey respond to consumed heterospecifics? Testing hypothesis of perceived risk. Copeia 2009: 190–194.
- Skelly D. K. 1994. Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. Animal Behaviour 47: 465–468.
- Skelly D. K. 1997. Tadpole communities: pond permanence and predation are powerful forces shaping the structure of tadpole communities. American Scientist 85: 36–45.
- Spieler M. & Linsenmair K. E. 1999. Aggregation behaviour of Bufo maculates tadpoles as an antipredator mechanism. Ethology 105: 665–686.
- Wilbur H. M. 1980. Complex life cycles. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 67–93.
- Wilson D. J. & Lefcort H. 1993. The effect of predator diet on the alarm response of Red-legged Frog Rana aurora tadpoles. Animal Behaviour 46: 1017–1019.
- Wisenden B. D. 2000. Olfactory assessment of predation risk in the aquatic environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B Biological Sciences 355: 1205–1208.


