Vol. 77 (2) 2025

ARTICLES

Are Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas Effective in Conserving the Habitat of the Glacial Relict Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Piciformes: Picidae) in the Present and Future?

Teodora Popović*

More info

*Physical Geography Department, Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić”, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ðure Jakšića 9, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; E-mail: t.popovic@gi.sanu.ac.rs

https://doi.org/10.71424/azb77.2.002821

PDF

Abstract

The three-toed woodpecker Picoides tridactylus is one of the rarest bird species in Serbia. Its distribution is limited to high-altitude forests in South-Western Serbia, where it represents a glacial relict. As a habitat specialist, it is vulnerable to climate change impacts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in conserving suitable habitats for P. tridactylus in the present and the future (2050) under the moderate SSP2-4.5 and extreme SSP5-8.5 greenhouse gas emission scenarios. To accomplish this, a gap analysis was performed in QGIS by overlapping species distribution maps in the present and the future with the distribution of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in South-Western Serbia. Future projections were created using the warm/dry global climate model HadGEM3-GC31-LL, which had the greatest negative impact on the studied species and could, therefore, provide insight into the effectiveness of the Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas under the high climatic pressure. The results indicated that this network would encompass > 90% of species suitable habitats by 2050. Nevertheless, moderately and highly suitable habitats for this species were shown to have a drastic reduction and/or a complete loss by 2050, both within and outside the network, indicating that it will probably become less suitable for P. tridactylus in the future. To mitigate the expected changes, it is necessary to provide adequate protection measure now by preserving the suitable habitats for this species. Currently, there are still 52.41 km2 of moderately suitable habitats outside the network that should become conservation priority. Given that Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in Serbia face various threats, I recommend an adaptive management measures as a way to maintain the habitat of this endangered woodpecker in Serbia.

Key words

climate change, gap analysis, habitat specialist, southwestern Serbia

How to Cite
Popović T. 2025. Are Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas Effective in Conserving the Habitat of the Glacial Relict Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Piciformes: Picidae) in the Present and Future? Acta zoologica bulgarica 77 (20): 257-272.

References

  1. Araújo M. B., Alagador D., Cabeza M., Nogués-Bravo D. & Thuiller W. 2011. Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecology Letters 14 (5): 484-492.
  2. Arcilla N. & Strazds M. 2023. Ten Principles for Bird-Friendly Forestry: Conservation Approaches in Natural Forests Used for Timber Production. Birds 4 (2): 245-261.
  3. Balasso M. 2016. Ecological requirements of the threetoed woodpecker (Picoides tridactylus L.) in boreal forests of northern Sweden [Master’s Thesis]. Umeå, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. 30 p. https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/8777/ (accessed on 2 February 2025).
  4. Barbaro L., Blache S., Trochard G., Arlaud C., de Lacoste N. & Kayser Y. 2016. Hierarchical habitat selection by Eurasian Pygmy Owls Glaucidium passerinum in old-growth forests of the southern French Prealps. Journal of Ornithology 157: 333-342.
  5. Bässler C., Müller J., Hothorn T., Kneib T., Badeck F. & Dziock F. 2010. Estimation of the extinction risk for high-montane species as a consequence of global warming and assessment of their suitability as cross-taxon indicators. Ecological Indicators 10 (2): 341-352.
  6. Beresford A. E., Buchanan G. M., Donald P. F., Butchart S. H. M., Fishpool L.D.C. & Rondinini C. 2011. Poor overlap between the distribution of Protected Areas and globally threatened birds in Africa. Animal Conservation 14 (2): 99-107.
  7. Biodiversity Information System for Europe. n.d. Three-Toed Woodpecker – Picoides tridactylus. https://biodiversity.europa.eu/species/1217 (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  8. BirdLife International. 2014. Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas: A global network for conserving nature and benefiting people. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. 24 p.
  9. BirdLife International. 2024. Species factsheet: Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/three-toed-woodpecker-picoides-tridactylus/details (accessed on 15 June 2024).
  10. Bollmann K., Braunisch V. & Arlettaz R. 2014. Predicted effects of climate change on indicator species of structural and biological diversity in mountain forests: towards adaptive forest management in the face of environmental uncertainty. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000311144 (accessed on 20 June 2024).
  11. Bouget C., Parmain G., Gilg O., Noblecourt T., Nusillard B., Paillet Y., Pernot C., Larrieu L. & Gosselin F. 2014. Does a set-aside conservation strategy help the restoration of old-growth forest attributes and recolonization by saproxylic beetles? Animal Conservation 17 (4): 342-353.
  12. Bowgen K. M., Kettel E.F., Butchart S. H. M., Carr J. A., Foden W. B., Magin G., Morecroft M. D., Smith R. K., Stein B. A., Sutherland W. J., Thaxter C. B. & Pearce-Higgins J. W. 2022. Conservation interventions can benefit species impacted by climate change. Biological Conservation 269: 109524.
  13. Brambilla M., Bergero V., Bassi E. & Falco R. 2015. Current and future effectiveness of Natura 2000 network in the central Alps for the conservation of mountain forest owl species in a warming climate. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61: 35-44.
  14. Brambilla M., Pedrini P., Rolando A. & Chamberlain D. E. 2016. Climate change will increase the potential conflict between skiing and high-elevation bird species in the Alps. Journal of Biogeography 43 (11): 2299-2309.
  15. Brambilla M., Resano-Mayor J., Scridel D., Anderle M., Bogliani G., Braunisch V., Capelli F., Cortesi M., Horrenberger N., Pedrini P., Sangalli B., Chamberlain D., Arlettaz R. & Rubolini D. 2018. Past and future impact of climate change on foraging habitat suitability in a high-alpine bird species: Management options to buffer against global warming effects. Biological Conservation 221: 209-218.
  16. Brambilla M., Rubolini D., Appukuttan O., Calvi G., Karger D. N., Kmecl P., Mihelič T., Sattler T., Seaman B., Teufelbauer N., Wahl J. & Celada C. 2022. Identifying climate refugia for high-elevation Alpine birds under current climate warming predictions. Global Change Biology 28 (14): 4276-4291.
  17. Braunisch V., Coppes J., Arlettaz R., Suchant R., Zellweger F. & Bollmann K. 2014. Temperate Mountain Forest Biodiversity under Climate Change: Compensating Negative Effects by Increasing Structural Complexity. PLoS ONE 9 (5): e97718.
  18. Butchart S. H. M., Scharlemann J. P. W., Evans M. I., Quader S., Aricò S., Arinaitwe J., Balman M., Bennun L. A., Bertzky B., Besançon C., Boucher T. M., Brooks T. M., Burfield I. J., Burgess N. D., Chan S., Clay R. P., Crosby M. J., Davidson N. C., De Silva N., . . . & Woodley S. 2012. Protecting Important Sites for Biodiversity Contributes to Meeting Global Conservation Targets. PLoS One 7 (3): e32529.
  19. Bütler R., Angelstam P., Ekelund P. & Schlaepfer R. 2004. Dead wood threshold values for the three-toed woodpecker presence in boreal and sub-Alpine forest. Biological Conservation 119 (3): 305-318.
  20. Campedelli T., Tellini Florenzano G., Londi G., Cutini S. & Fornasari L. 2010. Effectiveness of the Italian national protected areas system in conservation of farmland birds: A gap analysis. Ardeola 57: 51-64.
  21. Carrol M. J., Dennis P., Pearce-Higgins J. W. & Thomas C. D. 2011. Maintaining northern peatland ecosystems in a changing climate: effects of soil moisture, drainage and drain blocking on craneflies. Global Change Biology 17 (9): 2991-3001.
  22. Cerman K., Rajković D., Topić B., Topić G.., Shurulinkov P., Mihelič T. & Delgado J. D. 2022. Environmental Niche Modelling Predicts a Contraction in the Potential Distribution of Two Boreal Owl Species under Different Climate Scenarios. Animals 12 (22): 3226.
  23. Chamberlain D., Arlettaz R., Caprio E., Maggini R., Pedrini P., Rolando A. & Zbinden N. 2012. The altitudinal frontier in avian climate impact research. Ibis 154: 205-209.
  24. Chape S., Spalding M. & Jenkins M.D. 2008. The World’s Protected Areas: Status, Values and Prospects in the 21st Century. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press. 359 p.
  25. Climate-ADAPT. 2019. Adaptive management of natural habitats. https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/en/metadata/adaptation-options/adaptive-management-of-natural-habitats (accessed on 2 February 2025).
  26. Crofts R. 2004. Linking Protected Areas to the Wider World: A Review of Approaches. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 6 (2): 143-156.
  27. Ćurčić N. B., Milinčić U. V., Stranjančević A. & Milinčić M. A. 2019. Can winter tourism be truly sustainable in natural protected areas? Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA 69 (3): 241-252.
  28. del Hoyo J., Collar N. & Christie D. A. 2020. Eurasian Three-toed Woodpecker (Picoides tridactylus), version 1.0. In: Billerman S. M., Keeney B. K., Rodewald P. G. & Schulenberg T. S. (Eds.): Birds of the World. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.ettwoo1.01 (accessed on 1 May 2024).
  29. Diaz H.F., Grosjean M. & Graumlich L. 2003. Climate Variability and Change in High Elevation Regions: Past, Present and Future. Climatic Change 59: 1-4.
  30. Donald P. F., Sanderson F. J., Burfield I. J., Bierman S. M., Gregory R. D. & Waliczky Z. 2007. International Conservation Policy Delivers Benefits for Birds in Europe. Science 317 (5839): 810-813.
  31. Doyon F., Higgelke P. E. & MacLeod H. L. 2000. Three-Toed Woodpecker (Picoides tridactylus). https://isfort.uqo.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Doyon-et-al.-2000.-Three-toed-woodpecker-Picoides-tridactylus.pdf (accessed on 19 July 2024).
  32. Duskov L., Filipovic D. & Djurdjevic V. 2020. Assessment of climate change risks to natural resources in the Republic of Serbia. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 29: 2758-2765.
  33. Esseen P. A., Ehnström B., Ericson L. & Sjöberg K. 1997. Boreal Forests. Ecological Bulletins 46: 16-47.
  34. European Commission: Directorate-General for Environment. 2013. Guidelines on climate change and Natura 2000 – Dealing with the impact of climate change, on the management of the Natura 2000 network of areas of high biodiversity value. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 105 p. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/29715 (accessed on 3 February 2025).
  35. European Environment Agency. 2020. CORINE Land Cover 2018 (raster 100 m), Europe, 6-yearly—version 2020_20u1, May 2020. https://sdi.eea.europa.eu/catalogue/copernicus/api/records/960998c1-1870-4e82-8051-6485205ebbac?language=all (accessed on 10 January 2024).
  36. European Space Agency. n.d. Copernicus DEM—Global and European Digital Elevation Model (COP-DEM). https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/collections/copernicus-digital-elevation-model (accessed on 10 January 2024).
  37. Evans D. 2012. Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 network. Nature Conservation 1: 11-26.
  38. Gavioli A., Filipe A.F., Patonai K., Milardi M. & Castaldelli G. 2023. Effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network for freshwater fish conservation in a Mediterranean region. Frontiers in Environmental Science 11: 1122464.
  39. Gruber B., Evans D., Henle K., Bauch B., Schmeller D. S., Dziock F., Henry P.-Y., Lengyel S., Margules C. & Dormann C. F. 2012. “Mind the gap!” – How well does Natura 2000 cover species of European interest? Nature Conservation 3: 45-63.
  40. Hole D. G., Willis S. G., Pain D. J., Fishpool L. D., Butchart S. H. M., Collingham Y. C., Rahbek C. & Huntley B. 2009. Projected impacts of climate change on a continent-wide protected area network. Ecology Letters 12 (5): 420-431.
  41. Hoyt J. S. & Hannon S. J. 2002. Habitat associations of black-backed and three-toed woodpeckers in the boreal forest of Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32 (10): 1881-1888.
  42. Huntley B., Collingham Y. C., Green R. E., Hilton G. M., Rahbek C. & Willis S. G. 2006. Potential impacts of climatic change upon geographical distributions of birds. Ibis 148 (s1): 8-28.
  43. Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia. n.d. Strictly Protected Wild Species of Plants, Animals and Fungi. https://www.zzps.rs/wp/pdf/Prilog1-Pravilnika-o-proglasenju-i-zastiti-strogo-zasticenih-i-zasticenih-divljih-vrsta-biljaka,-zivotinja-i-gljiva.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2024) (In Serbian).
  44. Jennings M. D. 2000. Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results*. Landscape Ecology 15: 5-20.
  45. Jiguet F., Gadot A.-S., Julliard R., Newson S. E. & Couvet D. 2007. Climate envelope, life history traits and the resilience of birds facing global change. Global Change Biology 13 (8): 1672-1684.
  46. Kajtoch Ł., Figarski T. & Pelka J. 2013. The role of forest structural elements in determining the occurrence of two specialist woodpecker species in the Carpathians, Poland. Ornis Fennica 90 (1): 23-40.
  47. Kukkala A.S., Arponen A., Maiorano L., Moilanen A., Thuiller W., Toivonen T., Zupan L., Brotons L. & Cabeza M. 2016a. Matches and mismatches between national and EU-wide priorities: Examining the Natura 2000 network in vertebrate species conservation. Biological Conservation 198: 193-201.
  48. Kukkala A. S., Santangeli A., Butchart S. H. M., Maiorano L., Ramirez I., Burfield I. J. & Moilanen A. 2016b. Coverage of vertebrate species distributions by Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas and Special Protection Areas in the European Union. Biological Conservation 202: 1-9.
  49. Lamarre V. & Tremblay J. A. 2021. Occupancy of the American Three-Toed Woodpecker in a Heavily-Managed Boreal Forest of Eastern Canada. Diversity 13 (1): 35.
  50. Lisón F., Sánchez-Fernández D. & Calvo J. F. 2015. Are species listed in the Annex II of the Habitats Directive better represented in Natura 2000 network than the remaining species? A test using Spanish bats. Biodiversity and Conservation 24 (10): 2459-2473.
  51. López-López P., García-Ripollés C., Soutullo Á., Cadahía L. & Urios V. 2007. Are important bird areas and special protected areas enough for conservation?: the case of Bonelli’s eagle in a Mediterranean area. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 3755-3780.
  52. Maiorano L., Amori G., Montemaggiori A., Rondinini C., Santini L., Saura S. & Boitani L. 2015. On how much biodiversity is covered in Europe by national protected areas and by the Natura 2000 network: insights from terrestrial vertebrates. Conservation biology: the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 29 (4): 986-995.
  53. Margules C. R. & Pressey R. L. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243-253.
  54. Mihailović D. T., Lalić B., Drešković N., Mimić G., Djurdjević V. & Jančić M. 2015. Climate change effects on crop yields in Serbia and related shifts of Köppen climate zones under the SRES-A1B and SRES-A2. International Journal of Climatology 35 (11): 3320-3334.
  55. Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection. 2014. The fifth national report to the United Nations Convention on biological diversity. Belgrade, Serbia: Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection. 119 p. https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/rs/rs-nr-05-en.pdf
  56. Ministry of environmental protection. 2024. New protected area is declared – Special Nature Reserve “Mojstirsko-Draške planine”. https://www.ekologija.gov.rs/saopstenja/vesti/proglaseno-novo-zasticeno-podrucje-specijalni-rezervat-prirode-mojstirsko-draske-planine (accessed on 5 February 2025) (In Serbian).
  57. Morán-López R., Cortés Gañán E., Uceda Tolosa O. & Sánchez Guzmán J. M. 2020. The umbrella effect of Natura 2000 annex species spreads over multiple taxonomic groups, conservation attributes and organizational levels. Animal Conservation 23 (4): 407-419.
  58. Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working Group. 2015. Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nature Climate Change 5: 424-430.
  59. Mwangi M. A. K., Butchart S. H. M., Munyekenye F. B., Bennun L. A., Evans M. I., Fishpool L. D. C., Kanyanya E., Madindou I., Machekele J., Matiku P., Mulwa R., Ngari A., Siele J. & Stattersfield A. J. 2010. Tracking trends in key sites for biodiversity: a case study using Important Bird Areas in Kenya. Bird Conservation International 20 (3): 215-230.
  60. Pakkala T., Tiainen J., Piha M. & Kouki, J. 2018. Nest tree characteristics of the old-growth specialist Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus. Ornis Fennica 95 (3): 89-102.
  61. Parmesan C. & Yohe G. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37-42.
  62. Pavlović M. A. 2019. Geographical regions of Serbia 2: mountain-basin-valley macroregion. Belgrade, Serbia: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Geografski fakultet. 366 p. (In Serbian).
  63. Payne D., Spehn E. M., Snethlage M. & Fischer M. 2017. Opportunities for research on mountain biodiversity under global change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 29: 40-47.
  64. Pechacek P. & d’Oleire-Oltmanns W. 2004. Habitat use of the three-toed woodpecker in central Europe during the breeding period. Biological Conservation 116 (3): 333-341.
  65. Popović T., Ćurčić N.B., Ðurđić S., Stanojević G. & Raković M. 2024. An Assessment of the Climate Change Impacts on the Distribution of the Glacial Relict Woodpecker Three-Toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus. Animals 14 (13): 1879.
  66. Potts A. J., Hedderson T. A., Franklin J. & Cowling R. M. 2013. The Last Glacial Maximum distribution of South African subtropical thicket inferred from community distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography 40 (2): 310-322.
  67. Puzović S., Sekulić G., Stojnić N., Grubač B. & Tucakov M. 2009. Important Bird Areas in Serbia. Belgrade, Serbia: Ministarstvo životne sredine i prostornog planiranja, Zavod za zaštitu prirode Srbije i Pokrajinski sekretarijat za zaštitu životne sredine i održivi razvoj. 279 p. (In Serbian).
  68. QGIS Development Team. 2022. QGIS Geographic Information System. Grüt, Switzerland: QGIS Association. https://www.qgis.org (accessed on 29 April 2022).
  69. Radišić D. 2019. Estimating the effectiveness of protected areas and IBA network in the conservation of selected bird species in Serbia [Doctoral dissertation]. Novi Sad, Serbia: Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad. 234 p. (In Serbian).
  70. Radišić D., Mišković M., Jovanović S., Nikolić T., Sekulić G., Vujić A. & Milić D. 2019. Protected area networks are insufficient for the conservation of threatened farmland species: a case study on corncrake (Crex crex) and lesser grey shrike (Lanius minor) in Serbia. Archives of Biological Sciences 71 (1): 111-121.
  71. Rajković D. & Vasić V. 2018. Three-Toed Woodpecker. In: Radišić D., Vasić V., Puzović S., Ružić M., Šćiban M., Grubač B. & Vujić A. (Eds.): Red Book of Fauna of Serbia III – Birds. Belgrade, Serbia: Zavod za zaštitu prirode Srbije, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Prirodno-matematički fakultet, Departman za biologiju i ekologiju, Društvo za zaštitu i proučavanje ptica Srbije, pp. 282-284. (In Serbian).
  72. Rassati G. 2014. Responsiveness to acoustic stimulation, distribution and habitat preferences of the Grey-headed Woodpecker, Picus canus, and the Three-toed Woodpecker, Picoides tridactylus, in Friuli-Venezia Giulia (North-eastern Italy). Rivista Italiana di Ornitologia – Research in Ornithology 84 (1): 41-52.
  73. Rayner L., Lindenmayer D. B., Wood J. T., Gibbons P. & Manning A. D. 2014. Are protected areas maintaining bird diversity? Ecography 37: 43-53.
  74. Roberge J.-M., Angelstam P. & Villard M.-A. 2008. Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests—Deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning. Biological Conservation 141 (4): 997-1012.
  75. Romero-Calcerrada R. & Luque S. 2006. Habitat quality assessment using Weights-of-Evidence based GIS modelling: The case of Picoides tridactylus as species indicator of the biodiversity value of the Finnish forest. Ecological Modelling 196 (1-2): 62-76.
  76. Salzman J., Bennett G., Carroll N., Goldstein A. & Jenkins M. 2018. The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Natural Sustainability 1: 136-144.
  77. Scott J. M., Davis F., Csuti B., Noss R., Butterfield B., Groves C., Anderson H., Caicco S., D’Erchia F., Edwards T. C. Jr., Ulliman J. & Gerald Wright R. 1993. Gap Analysis: A Geographic Approach to Protection of Biological Diversity. Wildlife Monographs 123: 3-41.
  78. Scridel D., Brambilla M., Martin K., Lehikoinen A., Iemma A., Matteo A., Jähnig S., Caprio E., Bogliani G., Pedrini P., Rolano A., Arlettaz R. & Chamberlain D. 2018. A review and meta-analysis of the effects of climate change on Holarctic mountain and upland bird populations. Ibis 160 (3): 489-515.
  79. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2009. Connecting Biodiversity and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Report of the Second Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Biodiversity and Climate Change. Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 126 p. https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-41-en.pdf (accessed on 3 February 2025).
  80. Shurulinkov P., Stoyanov G., Komitov E., Daskalova G. & Ralev A. 2012. Contribution to the Knowledge on Distribution, Number and Habitat Preferences of Rare and Endangered Birds in Western Rhodopes Mts, Southern Bulgaria. Strigiformes and Piciformes. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 64: 43-56.
  81. Shurulinkov P. & Fedchuk D. 2015. Observations of Pigmy Owl (Glaucidium passerinum) and Three-toed Woodpecker (Picoides tridactylus) in Mt. Durmitor, Montenegro. Historia naturalis bulgarica 22: 101-103.
  82. Spehn E. 2011. Mountain Biodiversity. Effects of climate change and how to manage them. Sustainable Mountain Development 60: 40-43.
  83. Spiridonov G., Velev K. & Nikolov S. C. 2007. Three-toed Woodpecker. In: Iankov P. (Ed.): Atlas of the Breeding Birds in Bulgaria. Sofia, Bulgaria: Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds, pp. 374-375.
  84. Spiridonov G., Spassov N. & Ivanov V. 2008. New Records of Three Relict Bird Species in the Rhodopes. Historia naturalis bulgarica 19: 181-182.
  85. Stevanović V. B. 2022. Biogeographical Characteristics of the Territory of Serbia: Richness and Spatial Distribution of Biodiversity, Endemism and Biogeographical Regionalization. In: Manić E., Nikitović V. & Djurović P. (Eds.): The Geography of Serbia. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 99-117.
  86. Trautmann S. 2018. Climate Change Impacts on Bird Species. In: Tietze D. T. (Ed.): Bird Species: How They Arise, Modify and Vanish. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 217-234.
  87. Trochet A. & Schmeller D. 2013. Effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network to cover threatened species. Nature Conservation 4: 35-53.
  88. UNEP-WCMC & IUCN. 2024. Protected Planet: Protected Area Profile for Serbia: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)/OECM Database. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. https://doi.org/10.34892/6fwd-af11 (accessed on 16 May 2024).
  89. Vasić V., Grubač B., Raković M. & Čović S. 2009. Records of Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus in Serbia. Ciconica 18: 147-155.
  90. Virkkala R., Rajasärkkä A., Väisänen R. A., Vickholm M. & Virolainen E. 1994a. The Significance of Protected Areas for the Land Birds of Southern Finland. Conservation Biology 8 (2): 532-544.
  91. Virkkala R., Rajasärkkä A., Väisänen R. A., Vickholm M. & Virolainen E. 1994b. Conservation value of nature reserves: do hole-nesting birds prefer protected forests in southern Finland? Annales Zoologici Fennici 31 (1): 173-186.
  92. Virkkala R., Heikkinen R. K., Fronzek S., Kujala H. & Leikola N. 2013. Does the protected area network preserve bird species of conservation concern in a rapidly changing climate? Biodiversity and Conservation 22: 459-482.
  93. Virkkala R., Leikola N., Kujala H., Kivinen S., Hurskainen P., Kuusela S., Valkama J. & Heikkinen R. K. 2022. Developing fine-grained nationwide predictions of valuable forests using biodiversity indicator bird species. Ecological Applications 32 (2): e2505.
  94. Waliczky Z., Fishpool L. D. C., Butchart S. H. M., Thomas D., Heath M. F., Hazin C., Donald P. F., Kowalska A., Dias M. P. & Allinson T. S. M. 2019. Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): their impact on conservation policy, advocacy and action. Bird Conservation International 29 (2): 199-215.
  95. WorldClim. n.d. Historical climate data. https://www.worldclim.org/data/worldclim21.html (accessed on 20 February 2024).
  96. Zhu B., Wang B., Zou B., Xu Y., Yang B., Yang N. & Ran J. 2020. Assessment of habitat suitability of a high-mountain Galliform species, buff-throated partridge (Tetraophasis szechenyii). Global Ecology and Conservation 24: e01230.